@inproceedings{10.1007/978-3-030-73043-7_19,

title = {A Comparative Analysis of Different Software Packages for 3D Modelling of Complex Geometries},

author = {Styliani Verykokou and Sofia Soile and Fotis Bourexis and Panagiotis Tokmakidis and Konstantinos Tokmakidis and Charalabos Ioannidis},

editor = {Marinos Ioannides and Eleanor Fink and Lorenzo Cantoni and Erik Champion},

url = {https://www.springerprofessional.de/en/a-comparative-analysis-of-different-software-packages-for-3d-mod/19062226},

isbn = {978-3-030-73043-7},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-01-01},

urldate = {2021-01-01},

booktitle = {Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection},

pages = {228--240},

publisher = {Springer International Publishing},

address = {Cham},

abstract = {The purpose of this paper is the investigation of the performance of four well-established commercial and open-source software packages for automated image-based 3D reconstruction of complex cultural and natural heritage sites, i.e., Agisoft Metashape, RealityCapture, MicMac and Meshroom. The case study is part of the inaccessible giant rock of St. Modestos, in the archaeological site of Meteora. In terms of computational time, the commercial software packages were the most time-efficient solutions, with Metashape being the fastest one. They also have a friendlier user interface, which makes them adoptable even by non-photogrammetrists. $Alpha$ll four solutions yielded approximately comparable results in terms of accuracy and may be used for generation of 3D dense point clouds of complex sites. With the exception of Meshroom, they may produce georeferenced results. Also, with the exception of MicMac, which did not yield satisfactory results in terms of textured mesh, they may be used for generating photorealistic 3D models. The comparative analysis of the results achieved by the tested software will serve as the basis for establishing photogrammetric pipelines that may be generally used for 3D reconstruction of complex geometries.},

keywords = {3D model, geometric documentation, Software evaluation},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inproceedings}

}